Part I, 10 Planks of The Communist Manifesto to discover the truth and learn how to know your enemy...

Part II, Who and What is the IRS?

Karl Marx describes in his communist manifesto, the ten steps necessary to destroy a free enterprise system and replace it with a system of omnipotent government power, so as to effect a communist socialist state. Those ten steps are known as the Ten Planks of The Communist Manifesto…

The following brief presents the original ten planks within the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848, along with the Crown/Britsh Territorial the DC United States of America and the DC STATE OF CALIFORNIA US Sub Corp adopted counterpart for each of the planks.

From comparison it's clear MOST Americans have by myths, fraud and deception under the color of law, color of authority and color of office and by their own Crown / British Foreign agents masquerading as Government and politicians in both the Republican and Democratic and parties, been transformed into Communists.

Another thing to remember, Karl Marx in creating the Communist Manifesto designed these planks AS A TEST to determine whether a society has become communist or not.

If they are all in effect and in force, then the people ARE practicing communists.

Communism, by any other name is still communism, and is VERY VERY destructive to the individual and to the society!!

The 10 PLANKS stated in the Communist Manifesto and some of their American counterparts are...

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.
Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)

This web site includes Case after case demonstrating that DC STATE OF CALIFORNIA Corporation is openly engaged in the destruction of Property rights with out due process of law through courts that are designed to provide merely the illusion of justice and fair dealing. This courts are RICO's engaged in legal plunder of property under color of law, color of office and color of Authority aka Theft and International war crimes. 

Those engaged in these crimes are engaged in sedition, treason and perfidy.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".

All Americans have been tricked in to paying a tax on the premise that they are Foreigners (DC Crown / British Terrirtorial Slaves / Subkects and not American nationals / state nationals

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

The STATE has long been confiscating property through the inheritance scam. Again this only applies to DC United States slaves / subjects. Note however, Americans were converted in to US DC Slaves/subjects through fraud, sedition and treason! Any act enacted in fraud is in fact legally invalid and void!

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc...).

It should be noted that the IRS is a manifestation of the International Banksters illegally operating in America (see, Part II, Who and What is the IRS?). Internal Revenue Service, an agency of the Department of the Treasury, Puerto Rico.

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.

There is nothing Federal about the Federal Reserve. It was created by a cabal of Talmudic International so called Banksters reported by investigators to be made up as follows:

I care not what puppet  is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the  British Empire and I control the British money supply." It also controls the FED and the UNITED NATIONS who's original ownership is found below (click hyper link). 

 - Nathan Mayer Rothschild

FEDERAL RESERVE Money System (same are behind the UNITED NATIONS Corporation):

Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York

The "UN" is a corporation founded in France several years before the United Nations Charter was ever created. And here, for your edification, are the Principal Parties of Interest driving the "UN Agenda"----- Current version UN Corp dba World Bank dba FEDERAL RESERVE --- 52% owned by Rothschild Bank of London and Berlin; 8% owned by Lazard Freres Bank of Paris; 8% owned by Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, 8% owned by Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam; 6% owned by Lehman Brothers of New York; 6% owned by Kuhn Loeb of New York; 6% owned by Chase Manhattan/Rockefeller Bank of New York; 6% owned by Goldman Sachs. (There may be some changes in ownership(s) since this list was compiled, but the above is accurate for the most part.)

The above explains why the CROWN/British the United States of America Terrirtorial Governance gave $233.7Bn pilfered from Americans to Israel over the last six decades? 

6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State.
Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read "controlled or subsidized" rather than "owned"… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.
Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
Americans are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, but are actually "government force-tax-funded schools " Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education" . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like "majority rules", and "pay your fair share". WHERE are the words "fair share" in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is "fair share" even suggested !! The philosophical concept of "fair share" comes from the Communist maxim, "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism. ... America was made the greatest society by its private initiative WORK ETHIC ... Teaching ourselves and others how to "fish" to be self sufficient and produce plenty of EXTRA commodities to if so desired could be shared with others who might be "needy"... Americans have always voluntarily been the MOST generous and charitable society on the planet.

Public Schools’ “Social Justice Education” Cloaks Marxist Teaching:

Do changing words, change the end result? ... By using different words, is it all of a sudden OK to ignore or violate the provisions or intent of the Constitution of the united States of America?????

The people (politicians) who believe in the SOCIALISTIC and COMMUNISTIC concepts, especially those who pass more and more laws implementing these slavery ideas, are traitors to their oath of office and to the Constitution of the united States of America... KNOW YOUR ENEMY ...Remove the enemy from within and from among us.

The Lawyers Guild - Bulwork of the Communist Party, : 

California Government Code 1027.5:

Part II,

Who and What is the IRS?


Who and What is the IRS? by Dan Meador
B.A.T.F. / IRS CRIMINAL FRAUD, by William Cooper

Who and What is the IRS?

Historical Note

History & New Evidence that it is a foreign agency.

By Dan Meador
April 1, 2000
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

"Evan" (Internet name) forwarded the following article by Bill Cooper, published in the September 1995 issue of Veritas Magazine. As I understand it, Wayne Bentson of Arizona was largely responsible for research referenced in the article.

Since I'm suffering the fatigue of not getting home from Tulsa until the wee hours of the morning, and can't seem to get kick-started to do what I should be doing, I'm going to take the opportunity to provide context for the lengthy Cooper article, and add information gleaned from research since. For those who haven't seen it, the Cooper article should be enlightening. Additionally, evidence revealed in my portion of this compiled article is going to floor many readers. However, before disclosing new evidence, I'm going to present something of a history.

Gail and I had just finished what we called the "monster" tax index when someone sent the Cooper article via FAX shortly after it was published in September 1995. Our index went through the Internal Revenue Code section-by-section, listing regulations as they appear in the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules, then we listed the regulation headings for the regulations. Because of our index, I was able to verify many of the references in the Cooper article without having to go to actual texts, and what I found was that many Cooper-Bentson conclusions were verified by the index. Of particular importance, we found that there are no implementing regulations for 26 U.S.C. Section 7621, which authorizes the President to establish revenue districts. Consequently, there are no revenue districts in States of the Union.

However, there was a significant gap in Cooper-Bentson research. At that point, they hadn't found origins of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, Puerto Rico. I documented it in late 1998 even though I knew where to look when I read the Downs v. Bidwell decision in 1997: The first civil governor of Puerto Rico established five bureaus in the Puerto Rico Dept. of Treasury on May 1, 1900. The five bureaus were eventually to become the Bureau of Internal Revenue, Puerto Rico, predecessor to the Internal Revenue Service. The name change of BIR to IRS was in 1953 in advance of implementing the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, based on Reorganization Plan 26 of 1950 and Reorganization Plan 1 of 1952. Early Puerto Rico legislation, beginning with the gubernatorial and executive committee acts of May 1900, are published in Senate Documents for the period, so it's just a matter of going through the publications to complete the merger history. Bentson and Cooper located origins of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, Philippines, and the Philippines special fund, in 1904 documents. The Philippines gained independence in 1946, leaving BIR, Puerto Rico as the only Bureau of Internal Revenue that was legislatively created, and not by Congress at that. The first Puerto Rico legislature in 1901 legislatively enacted executive acts of May 1900.

In 1934, Congress stipulated that the various special funds maintained by the Department of the Treasury would be known as trusts, i.e., Philippines Trusts ! & 2, and Puerto Rico Trust 62, all three of which are still in the books in Title 31 of the United States Code.

In his article, Cooper cites the Federal Register and the Internal Revenue Manual acknowledgment that Congress never created a Bureau of Internal Revenue. Someone else has since located a Supreme Court decision where justices of the Supreme Court affirm that Congress never created a Bureau of Internal Revenue or Internal Revenue Service. Consequently, IRS has no lawful authority to enforce anything in the Union as Congress is charged with responsibility for establishing any government department or agency that the Constitution itself does not establish.

At the tail end of this article, we're going to share disclosures attorneys in Illinois and Idaho have secured that constitute astounding revelations that should give everyone cause to rethink strategy relating to the Internal Revenue Service. Read on. I will continue the account of the research effort that lays the factual foundation.

In the historical account by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue published in the Federal Register and the Internal Revenue Manual, the Commissioner alleges that Congress clearly intended to create a Bureau of Internal Revenue in 1862 legislation that established the office of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. But reading the 1862 legislation reveals that there was no need for a Bureau of Internal Revenue or Internal Revenue Service. Congress established the offices of assessors and collectors, with one of each to be appointed for each revenue district. These offices were on the order of current U.S. Attorneys appointments. They were political patronage positions. The offices continued to exist until implementation of Reorganization Plan 26 of 1950.

In order to understand what happened via the reorganization plans behind the current Internal Revenue Code, we need to review what happened with respect to prohibition.

In 1933, the Twenty-first Amendment repealed the Eighteenth. However, Federal enforcement people continued to enforce state laws relating to alcohol to the point of the Constantine decision in December 1935. In the decision, the Supreme Court said that once the Eighteenth Amendment was repealed, State and Federal enforcement ceased to have concurrent jurisdiction for enforcement of alcohol-related laws as the Eighteenth Amendment contained the grant of authority. Once it was repealed, concurrent jurisdiction was repealed.

Until summer 1935, the Feds had operated on the alcohol administration act of 1926. That was replaced by the Federal Alcohol Administration Act of 1935, enacted that summer several months in advance of the Constantine decision. In the wake of the Constantine decision, a director was appointed, but the Federal Alcohol Administration wasn't established to administer the Alcohol Administration Act. Via Reorganization Plan 3 of 1940 administration of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act was transferred to the Bureau of Internal Revenue, predecessor of the Internal Revenue Service.

As the Cooper article suggests, BIR, Puerto Rico and/or BIR, Philippines had already encroached into States of the Union via China Trade Act legislation, which implemented maritime (customs) laws relating to trade in opium, cocaine and citric wines. The first drug-related law was passed in 1914, then with the 1918 amendment, the Feds began to enforce drug laws in the several States.

The timing was ideal. There was significant political mobilization responsible for the Eighteenth Amendment and alcohol prohibition, so the Feds took advantage of empathy for purging any kind of intoxicating substance. In his letter supporting the 1940 Reorganization Plan, Roosevelt said that BIR had been enforcing provisions of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, anyway, so the transfer of responsibility didn't effect significant change.

Some time before Cooper wrote his article, I read the 1992 New York v. United States decision. In the decision, the Supreme Court used the term "Cooperative Federalism".

My response was, "What the hell is Cooperative Federalism?"

The next time I saw published use of the term was in the title of an article in the 1992 edition of The Book of the States. In the meantime, I ran across the "Federalism" executive order Ronald Reagan put in place. The Reagan order, which technically preserves constitutional integrity, is the one Bill Clinton keeps trying to overhaul, but he is getting considerable resistance. This particular executive order is an executive policy statement, it doesn't meet standards of 3 U.S.C. Section 301 and the Federal Register Act. It is simply the prevailing policy statement that informally shapes relations between State and Federal governments.

Now we have two essential identifying terms: On the Federal side, "Federalism", and on the State side, "Cooperative Federalism".

Let's address the scheme of things through two constitutional questions: Have Article I 8, clauses 5 & 6 and Article I 10, paragraph one of the Constitution been repealed or amended? Has the Constitution been amended to effect prohibition against opium, cocaine, and other such substances?

We'll follow those questions with two more: Do we have gold and silver coin as our national currency? Do we have national prohibition against drugs?

In light of the first two questions, we can conclude that Congress has defaulted responsibility for providing a national currency of gold and silver coin, and our States of the Union are accommodating the fraud without a constitutional amendment; and in light of the second question, we can conclude that Federal government is exercising a power which is not enumerated in the Constitution, and our respective state governments are accommodating the usurpation of power.

Obviously, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was patently unconstitutional. At least it was if it applied to Union. But it might not be if it applied to United States Government itself, and territories and insular possessions of the United States. Likewise, the Federal drug laws would be legitimate if they applied to the District of Columbia and insular possessions of the United States. It is here that Congress has plenary or near-absolute power. And we can lengthen the list. The Federal Alcohol Administration Act is legitimate in Puerto Rico, but not Oklahoma. Likewise, the Social Security Act of 1935 is legitimate in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, etc., but not in Kansas. Where the latter is concerned, we see proper geographical application in definitions of "State", "United States" and "citizen" at 26 CFR §31.3121(e)-6.

At the January 1937 general conference of the Council of State Governments, delegates from a majority of our state legislatures endorsed the Declaration of Intergovernmental Dependence. This formalized what was already a working arrangement. States of the Union formally went on the Federal dole system, and by setting up the infrastructure, provided a forum for general agreement among state governing bodies as to what Federal encroachment they would accommodate.

Here are more relevant questions: Does the executive branch have legislative authority? Can the President unilaterally repeal law once it has been formally enacted by Congress?

Via Reorganization Plan 3 of 1940, Roosevelt reassigned duties of the Federal Alcohol Administration to BIR, thereby abandoning the agency Congress established, then via Reorganization Plan 26 of 1950, Truman effectively terminated the offices of assessor and collector Congress established in 1862, In other words, after the Supreme Court determined that Federal enforcement agencies had no authority to enforce state alcohol law in the several States, administration of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act was moved under authority of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, Puerto Rico for administration in insular possessions of the United States. By law, BIR, Puerto Rico could not be exercised in the Union, but since State governments were willing to accommodate Federal encroachment in return for whatever financial incentives Federal government provided, the fraud was and has generally been accommodated. The scheme worked well enough that in 1950, Truman followed the Roosevelt lead by authorizing BIR, i.e., IRS administration of Federal income tax law. But the geographical application remains the same, limited to the District of Columbia and insular possessions of the United States.

Through their gross income "source" research, Tupper Sausie, Thurston Bell, Larken Rose and various others have documented that the American people in general are liable for Federal income tax, but are liable only on income from foreign sources and insular possessions of the United States. These conclusions reinforce and are consistent with my research and research by Bentson and Cooper. With enactment of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, via Truman executive orders, the offices of assessor and collector of internal revenue were terminated, and administration of the Internal Revenue Code, by appearance, was turned over to the Internal Revenue Service, an agency of the Department of the Treasury, Puerto Rico.

We need to address one more entity, the "United States of America".

What is the United States of America? As it turns out, there are two entities called the "United States of America". The first and original, mentioned in the Preamble and Article II of the Constitution of the United States, was formally created in the Articles of Confederation. But some time after the Civil War, probably early in the twentieth century, a second "United States of America" came into being. The second is a political alliance or compact of the insular possessions of the United States.

Here I'm going to introduce evidence secured by John M. Ohman, an Idaho Falls, Idaho attorney. In the case styled Diversified Metal Products, Inc. v. T-Bow Company Trust, Internal Revenue Service, and Steve Morgan, case CV93-4117, filed in the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, the Booneville County Magistrates Court, Ohman filed an impleader petition.

Diversified Metal was served a notice of levy for money owed to the T-Bow Trust. In order to determine rightful ownership, Ohman filed the interpleader action on behalf of Diversified Metal. In his complaint, he stipulated facts. His fact #4 is as follows: "Defendant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is an agency of the United States government(tm)"

In her January 24, 2000 response, U.S. Attorney Betty H. Richardson made the following correction to Ohman's averment: "Denies that the Internal Revenue Service is an agency of the United States Government but admits that the United States of America would be a proper party to this action."

This is something I've tried to impress on people for most of two years, but few grasp the implications: The Constitution of the United States creates and vests authority in a governmental entity known as the "United States" or "United States Government." While it is "for" the United States of America, the Constitution vests absolutely no authority in the United States of America. Any time the United States prosecutes as case, whether civil or criminal, it must be in the name and by authority of the United States, not the United States of America. The only place the "United States of America" has any standing is in territorial courts in insular possessions of the United States, then the styling must be, "United States of America, ss, President of the United States". See title 48 of the United States Code for particulars relating to Puerto Rican and Virgin Islands courts.

If we read notes following the current 18 U.S.C. Section 1001, we find that the "United States of America" is currently defined as an agency of the United States. In the context of the Downes v. Bidwell decision, we find that these insular possessions, which are not incorporated in the constitutional scheme, are "foreign" to the United States, i.e., to the Union of States. Therefore, this political alliance or compact known as the United States of America, which first appeared in 1918 legislation, is a government foreign to the United States and the several States even though the member insular possessions belong to the United States.

The Richardson correction above verifies that the Internal Revenue Service is not an agency of United States Government, but the United States of America, clearly a distinct and different entity, would be a party of interest. It would be difficult to be any clearer on the subject, and the Rechardson correction tells us that people such as U.S. Attorneys, attorneys in the Department of Justice, and Federal judges are fully aware of the difference.

Michael Bufkin, a Dundee, Illinois attorney, undertook a delightful project. On December 18, 1998, he sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of the Treasury asking for documentation of authority for the Department of Justice to defend Internal Revenue Service personnel in civil or criminal cases. In an August 2, 1999 response, Leslie Howard in the national IRS office responded with the following: "A search was performed with the Office of Tax Crimes (Criminal Investigation) and with the Assistant Chief Counsel (Disclosure Litigation) and we have no documents responsible to your request. However, you may forward a copy of your request to the U.S. Attorney General's Office within the Department of Justice."

Bufkin did just that. In response to his September 21, 1999 FOIA to the Attorney General, Thomas J. McIntrye informed Bufkin that, "We have conducted a search of the appropriate indices to Criminal Division records and did not locate any records responsive to your request."

We don't know who has lawful authority to defend IRS personnel, but the Department of Justice and U.S. Attorneys don't. Possibly the foreign "United States of America" that is principal of interest and benefits from IRS initiatives has a raft of attorneys ready to defend these foreign agents.

As chance would have it, one of the people in our group recently received certification of documents on IRS Austin Region stationary that is headed, "United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service". The certification letters are dated November 16, 1999.

What we are dealing with amounts to invasion of a foreign government accommodated by our respective State governments. However, thanks to the diligence of people approaching IRS tyranny from several directions, we about have the whole nut documented and broken down.

With the context of what I've written, the Cooper article that follows will have more signficance.

Dan Meador Ponca City, Oklahoma


by William Cooper

CAJI News Service--Exclusive
B.A.T.F = I.R.S.
Citizen VS citizen


"The Congress shall have Power to Lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excise, to Pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;" The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 1, Section 8, paragraph 1.

" No Capitation or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration hereinbefore directed to be taken." The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 1, Section 9, paragraph 4.

CAJI Investigation

Investigation of the alleged Internal Revenue Service and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms has disclosed a broad, premeditated conspiracy to defraud the Citizens (freemen) of the united States of America. Examination of the United States Code, the Code of Federal Regulations, The Statutes at Large, Congressional record, The Federal Register, and Internal Revenue manuals, too numerous to list, reveals a crime of such magnitude, that words cannot adequately describe the betrayal of the American people. What we have uncovered has clearly been designed to circumvent the limitations of the Constitution for the united States and implement the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO within the 50 States. Marx and Engles claimed that in the effort to create a classless society, a "GRADUATED INCOME TAX" could be used as a weapon to destroy the middle class.


Magic is the art of illusion. Those who practice magic are called "Magi". They have created a web of obfuscation and confusion in the Law. When the courts have ruled them unconstitutional or unlawful they merely stepped outside JURISDICTION AND VENUE. By fooling the people they continued the Crime. These Magicians have convinced Americans that we have a status we do not. We are led to believe we must do things that are not required. Through the clever use of language the government promotes FRAUD.


The Bureau of Internal Revenue, and the alleged Internal Revenue Service were not created by Congress. These are not organizations or agencies of the Department of the Treasury or of the federal government They appear to be operated through pure trusts administered by the Secretary of the Treasury ( the Trustee ). The Settler of the trusts and the Beneficiary or Beneficiaries are Unknown. According to the law governing Trusts, the Information does not have to be revealed. (?)


The organization of the Department of the Treasury can be found in 31 United States Code, Chapter 3, beginning on page 7. You will not find the Bureau of Internal Revenue, the Internal Revenue Service, The Secret Service or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and firearms listed.

We learned that the Bureau of Internal Revenue, internal revenue, Internal Revenue service, internal revenue service, Official Internal Revenue Service, the Federal Alcohol Administration, Director Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Division, and the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms are one organization. We found this obfuscated.


The investigation found, that except for the very few who are engaged in specific activities, the Citizens of the 50 States of the united States of America have never been required to file or to pay "income taxes". The Federal government is engaging in constructive fraud on a massive scale. Americans who have been frightened into filing and paying "income taxes "have been robbed of their money. Millions of lives have been ruined. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people have been imprisoned on the pretense they violated laws that do not exist. Some have been driven to suicide. Marriages have been destroyed. Property has been confiscated to pay taxes that were never owed.


During the Civil war, Abraham Lincoln imposed a war tax upon the citizens. The war tax lawfully applied only to those citizens who resided WITHIN THE FEDERAL DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, AND FEDERALLY OWNED TERRITORIES, DOCKYARDS, NAVAL BASES, OR FORTS, and (?) those who were considered to be in rebellion against the Union. Many Citizens of the several States volunteered to pay. After the war the tax was repealed. THIS LEFT THE IMPRESSION THAT THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS COULD LEVY AN UNAPPORTIONED DIRECT TAX UPON THE CITIZENS OF THE SEVERAL STATES; WHEN IN FACT NO SUCH TAX HAD EVER BEEN IMPOSED. The tax was hot fraud as nothing was done to deceive the people. THOSE WHO WERE DECEIVED, IN FACT, DECEIVED THEMSELVES.!!


In the last century the United States acquired by CONQUEST the territory of the Philippine Islands, Guam, and Puerto Rico. The Philippine Customs Administrative Act was passed by the Philippine Commission during the period from Sept. 1, 1900 to August 31, 1902, to regulate trade with foreign countries and to create revenue in the form of duties, imposts, and excises. The act CREATED THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S FIRST TRUST FUND called Trust fund #1, the Philippine special fund (customs and duties), 31 USC, Section 1321. The Act was administered under the general Supervision and control of the Secretary of Finance and Justice.


The Philippine Commission passed another act known as The Internal Revenue Law of Nineteen Hundred and Four. This Act created the Bureau of Internal Revenue and the federal government's second trust fund (internal revenue), 31 USC, Section 1321. In the Act, Article 1, Section 2, we find, "There shall be established a Bureau of Internal Revenue, the chief officer of which Bureau shall be known as the Collector of Internal Revenue. He shall be appointed by the Civil Governor, with the advise and consent of the Philippine Commission, and shall receive a salary at the rate of eight thousand PESOS per annum. The Bureau of Internal Revenue shall belong to the Department of Finance and Justice." And in Section 3, we find, " The Collector of Internal Revenue, under the direction of the Secretary of Finance and Justice, shall have general superintendence of the assessment and collection of all taxed and excises imposed by this Act or by any Act amendatory thereof, and shall perform such other duties as may be required by law.


It was clear that the Customs Administrative Act was to fall within the JURISDICTION of the Bureau of the Internal Revenue which bureau was to be responsible for "all taxes and excises imposed by this Act," which clearly include import and export excise taxes. This effectively MERGED Customs and Internal Revenue in the Philippines."


When Prohibition was ratified in 1919 with the 18th Amendment, the government created federal bureaucracies to enforce he outlaw of alcohol. As protest and resistance to prohibition increased, so did new federal laws and the number of bureaucrats hired to enforce them. After much bloodshed and public anger, prohibition was repealed with the 21st Amendment which was ratified in 1933.


In 1933 President Roosevelt declared a "Banking Emergency". The Congress gave the President dictatorial powers under the "War Powers Act of 1917". Congress used the economic EMERGENCY as the excuse as the excuse to give blanket approval to any and all Presidential EXECUTIVE ORDERS. Roosevelt, with a little help from his socialist friends was prolific in his production of new legislation and executive orders. In 1935 the Public Administration Clearinghouse wrote, and Roosevelt introduced, The Federal Alcohol Act. Congress passed it into law. The Act established The Federal Alcohol Administration. That same year the Supreme Court in a monumental ruling struck down the act among many others on a long list of draconian and New Deal laws. The Federal Alcohol Administration did knot go away; it became involved in other affairs, placed in a sort of standby status.


At some unknown date prior to 1940 another Bureau of Internal Revenue was established in Puerto Rico. The 62nd Trust Fund was created and named Trust Fund #62 Puerto Rico special fund (Internal Revenue). Note that the Puerto Rico special fund has Internal Revenue , capital "I" & "R". The Philippine special fund (internal revenue) is in lower case letters.

Between 1904 and 1938 the China Trade Act was passed to deal with Opium, Cocaine and Citric wines shipped out of China. It appears to have been administered in the Philippines by the Bureau of Internal Revenue.


We studied a copy of The Code of Federal Registrations of the United States of America in force June 1, 1938, Title 26 - Internal Revenue, Chapter 1 - ( Parts 1-137). On page 65 it makes reference to the China Trade Act, where the first use of such terms as: income, credits, withholding, Assessment and Collection Deficiencies, extension of time for payment, and failure to file return. The entire substance of Title 26 deals with foreign individuals, foreign corporations, foreign insurance corporations, foreign ships, income from sources within possessions of the United States, Citizens of the United States and domestic corporations deriving income from sources within a possession of the United States, and China trade Act Corporations.


All of the taxes covered by these laws concerned the imposts, excise taxes, and duties to be collected by the Bureau of Internal Revenue for such items as narcotics, alcohol, tobacco, and firearms. The alleged Internal Revenue Service likes to make a big "to do" about the fact that Al Capone was jailed for tax evasion. The I.R.S. will not tell you that the tax Capone evaded was not "income tax" as we know it, but the tax due on the income from the alcohol which he had imported from Canada. If he had paid the tax he would not have been convicted. The Internal Revenue Act of 1939 was clearly concerned with all taxes, imposts, excises and duties collected on trade between the POSSESSIONS AND TERRITORIES of the United States and foreign individuals, foreign corporations, or foreign governments. The income tax laws have always applied only to the Philippines, Puerto Rico, District of Columbia, Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, territories and insular Possessions.

F.A.A. becomes B.I.R.

Under the Reorganization Plan Number 3 of 1940 which appears at 5 United States Code Service 903, the Federal Alcohol Administration and offices of members and Administrators thereof were abolished and their functions directed to be administered under direction and supervision of Secretary of Treasury through Bureau of Internal Revenue. We found this history in all of the older editions of 27 USCS, Section 201. It has been removed from current editions. Only two Bureaus of Internal Revenue have ever existed. One in the Philippines and another in Puerto Rico. Events that have transpired tell us that the Federal Alcohol Administration was absorbed by the Puerto Rico Trust # 62 (Internal Revenue).


World War II was the golden opportunity. Americans were willing to sacrifice almost anything if they thought that sacrifice would win the war. In that atmosphere Congress passed the Victory Tax Act. It mandated an Income Tax for the years 1943 and 1944 to be filed in the years 1944 and 1945. The Victory Tax Act automatically expired at the end of 1944. The Federal Government with the clever use of language, created the myth that the tax was Applicable to ALL Americans. Because of their desire to win the war, Americans filed and paid he tax. Because of IGNORANCE OF THE LAW, Americans filed and paid the tax. The Government promoted the FRAUD AND THREATENED THOSE WHO OBJECTED. Americans "forgot" that the law expired in 2 years. When the date had come and gone, they continued to keep "records"; they continued to file; and they continued to pay the tax. The Federal Government continued to print returns and COLLECT THE TAX. NEVER MIND THE FACT THAT NO CITIZEN OF ANY OF THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE UNION WAS EVER LIABLE TO PAY THE TAX IN THE FIRST PLACE.


The FICTION "that because it was an excise tax, it was legal" (lawful) IS NOT TRUE. The power of the Federal Government is limited to its own property as stated in Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 17, and to "regulate Commerce with FOREIGN NATIONS, and among the "several" States, and with the Indian tribes;" as stated in Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3, 18 USC, Section 921, Definitions, states," The term 'interstate or foreign commerce' INCLUDES commerce between any place in a State and any place outside of that State, or within any POSSESSION of the United States ( not INCLUDING the Canal Zone) or the District of Columbia, but such term DOES NOT INCLUDE commerce between places within the same State, but through any place outside of that State. The term 'State' INCLUDES the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the possessions of the United States (not INCLUDING the Canal Zone)." Only EMPLOYEES of the federal government, RESIDENTS of the District of Columbia, RESIDENTS of naval bases RESIDENTS of forts, U.S. Citizens of the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Territories, and insular possessions were lawfully required to file and pay the Victory Tax.

B.I.R. becomes I.R.S.

In 1953 the United States relinquished control over the Philippines Why do the Philippine pure Trusts #1 (customs duties) and #2 (internal revenue) continue to be administered today? Who are the Settlers of the Trusts? What is done with the funds in the Trusts? What businesses, if any, do these Trusts operate? Who are the Beneficiaries? Coincidentally on July 9, 1953, the Secretary of the Treasury, G.M. Humphery, by "virtue of the authority vested in me", changed the name of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, B.I.R. to Internal Revenue Service when he signed what is now Treasury Order 150-06. This was an obvious attempt to legitimize the Bureau of Internal Revenue. Without the Approval of Congress or the President, Humphrey, without any legal and LAWFUL authority, tried to turn a pure trust into an agency of the Department of the Treasury. His actions were illegal and unlawful but went unchallenged. Did he change the name of the B.I.R. in Puerto Rico or the B.I.R. in the Philippines? WE CANNOT FIND THE ANSWER.


In 1954, the United States and Guam became partners under the Mutual Security Act. The Act and other documents make reference to the definition of Guam and the United States as being INTERCHANGEABLE. In the same year the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 was passed. The Code provides for the United States and Guam to coordinate the "Individual Income Tax". Pertinent information on the tax issue may be found in 26 CFR 301.7654-1 : Constitution of U.S. and Guam Individual income taxes. 26 CFR 7654 - 1 (e): Military personnel in Guam, 48 USC Section 1421(i) : "Income tax laws" defined. The Constitution forbids unapportioned direct taxes upon the Citizens of the several States of the 50 States of the Union: Therefore the federal government must trick (defraud) people into volunteering to pay taxes as "U.S. citizens" of EITHER Guam, the Virgin Islands, or Puerto Rico. IT SOUNDS INSANE BUT IT IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE. [ AN I.R.S. HUMBUG ]

B.A.T.F. from I.R.S.

On June 6, 1972 Acting Secretary of the Treasury, Charles E. Walker signed Treasury Order Number 120-01 which establishes the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. He did this with the stroke of his PEN citing, "by virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of the Treasury, including the authority in Reorganization Plan No. 26 of 1950." He ordered the, "transfer, as specified herein, the functions, powers and duties of the Internal Revenue Service arising under laws relating to alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and explosives (including the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms division of the Internal Revenue Service) to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (hereinafter referred to as the Bureau) which is HEREBY established. The Bureau shall be headed by the Director, Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (hereinafter referred to as the Director). The Director shall perform his duties under the general direction of the Secretary of the Treasury (hereinafter referred to as the Secretary) and under the supervision of the Assistant Secretary (Enforcement, Tariff and Trade Affairs, and Operations) ( hereinafter referred to as the Assistant Secretary)."

B.A.T.F = I.R.S.

Treasury Order 120-01 assigned to the new B.A.T.F. CHAPTERS 51, 52, 53 OF THE Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and sections 7652 and 7653 of such code, chapters 61 through 80 inclusive of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (27 USC Chapter 8)[which, in 1935 the SUPREME COURT HAD DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL WITHIN THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE UNION,] 18 USC Chapter 44, Title VII Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (18 USC Appendix, sections 1201 - 1203, 18 USC 1262 - 1265, 1952 and 3615. etc. Mr Walker then makes a statement within TO 120-01 that is very revealing, "The terms 'Director, Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Division' and 'Commissioner of Internal Revenue' wherever used in regulations, rules, and instructions, and forms, issued or adopted for the administration and enforcement of the laws specified in paragraph 2 hereof, which are in effect or in use on the effective date of this Order, shall be held to mean 'the Director'". Walker seemed to branch the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), creating the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF), and then with that statement joined them back together into one. In the Federal Register, Volume 41, Number 180, of Wednesday, September 15, 1976 we find, "The term Director, Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Division ' has been replaced by the term ' Internal Revenue Service."

We found this pattern of deception and obfuscation everywhere we looked during our investigation. For further evidence of the fact that the I.R.S. and the B.A.T.F. are one in the same organization, check 27 USCA Section 201.

The Gift of the Magi

This is how the Magi perform magic. Secretary Humphrey with NO AUTHORITY, creates an AGENCY of the Department of the Treasury called "Internal Revenue Service", out of AIR, from AN OFFSHORE PURE TRUST, called "Bureau of Internal Revenue". The "SETTLER" and "BENEFICIARIES" of the trust are UNKNOWN. The "TRUSTEE" is the "SECRETARY of THE TREASURY". Acting Secretary Walker further LAUNDERS the trust by CREATING from the alleged "Internal Revenue Service", the "BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO AND FIREARMS".


Unlike Humphrey, however, Walker ASSUAGES himself of any guilt, when he NULLIFIED the order by PROCLAIMING, "The terms 'Director, Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Division' and 'Commissioner of Internal Revenue' wherever used in regulations, rules, and instructions, and forms, issued or adopted FOR THE ADMINISTRATION and ENFORCEMENT of the LAWS specified in paragraph 2 hereof, which are in effect or in use on the effective date of this Order, shall be held to mean the Director'".

Walker created the [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms] from the [Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division] of Humphrey's [Internal Revenue Service]. He then says, that, what was transferred, is the same ENTITY as the [Commissioner of Internal Revenue]. He KNEW he could not create something from nothing without the AUTHORITY OF CONGRESS and/or the President, so he made it look like he did something that he had, in fact, not done. TO COMPOUND THE FRAUD, the FEDERAL REGISTER PUBLISHED the unbelievable assertion that a PERSON HAD BEEN REPLACED WITH A THING; " the term Director Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Division has been replaced with the term Internal Revenue Service."


The FEDERAL Alcohol Administration, which ADMINISTERS the Federal Alcohol Act, and offices of members and Administrator thereof, were ABOLISHED, and their functions were DIRECTED to be ADMINISTERED under direction and supervision of Secretary of Treasury through Bureau of Internal Revenue, now Internal Revenue Service. THE FEDERAL ALCOHOL ACT WAS RULED "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" WITHIN THE 50 STATES; so was transferred to the B.I.R., which is an OFFSHORE TRUST, which became the I.R.S.; which gave BIRTH to the B.A.T.F.; AND SOMEHOW, the term [Director, Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Division], which is a PERSON within the B.A.T.F., spawned the alleged Internal Revenue Service via another flick of the pen on September 15, 1976. In a brilliant flash of LOGIC, Wayne C. Bentson DETERMINED that he could CHECK THESE FACTS, by filing a Freedom of Information Act request, asking the B.A.T.F. to:- "name the person who administers the Federal Alcohol Act." If we were wrong a reply stating that no record exists as to any name of any person who administers the Act. The request was submitted to the B.A.T.F. THE REPLY came on July 14, 1944, from the Secret Service, an unexpected source, which discloses a connection we had not suspected. THE REPLY STATES THAT JOHN MAGAW , OF THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS, of the [Department of the Treasury], administers THE FEDERAL ALCOHOL ACT. You may remember from the Waco hearings that JOHN MAGAW IS THE [DIRECTOR ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS]. All of our research was confirmed by that ADMISSION.


Despite all the pen flicking and the smoke and mirrors, there is no such organization of the Department of he Treasury known as "Internal Revenue Service" or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms." 31 USC IS 'Money and Finance' and therein is published the laws pertaining to the Department of the Treasury (D.O.T.). 31 USC, Chapter 3 is a statutory list of the organizations of the D.O.T.--- Internal Revenue Service and/or Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms ARE NOT LISTED WITHIN "31 USC" AS AGENCIES OR ORGANIZATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. --- THEY ARE REFERENCED, HOWEVER, AS, "TO BE AUDITED" BY THE CONTROLLER GENERAL IN 31 USC SECTION 713.


We have already demonstrated that both of these organizations are in reality the same organization. Where we find one we will surely find the other. In 27 CFR, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 250.11, DEFINITIONS, we find, "United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms office. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms office in Puerto Rico ... " and "Secretary - The Secretary of Puerto Rico", and "Revenue Agent - Any duly authorized Commonwealth Internal Revenue Agent of the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico." Remember that 'Internal Revenue' is the name of the Puerto Rico Trust #62. It is perfectly logical and reasonable that a Revenue Agent works as an employee for the Department of the treasury of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Where is I.R.S.

Where is the alleged "Internal Revenue Service?" The Internal Revenue Code of 1939, a.k.a. Internal Revenue Code of 1954, etc., etc.,; 27 CFR Refers to Title 26 as relevant to Title 27, ----- as per 27 CFR, Chapter 1, Section 250.30, ----- which states that 26 USC 5001 (a) (1) is governing a 27 USC law. ----- In fact 26 USC Chapters 51, 52, and 53 are the alcohol, tobacco and firearms taxes, administered by the Internal Revenue Service; alias Bureau of Internal Revenue; alias Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue; alias Director, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division; alias Internal Revenue Service.


According to 26 CFR Section 1.6001 - 1 (d), Records, [no one is required to keep records or file returns, unless specifically notified, by the district director, by notice served upon him, to make such returns, render such statements, or keep such specific records, as will enable the district director to determine, whether or not, such person is liable for tax under subtitle A of the Code.

26 CFR states that this rule includes State individual income taxes. --- Don't get yourself all lathered up because "State" means ... the District of Columbia, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, territories, and insular possessions.


44 USC says that every regulation or rule must be published in the Federal Register. It also states that every regulation or rule must be approved by the Secretary of the Treasury. If there is no regulation there is no implementation of Law. There is no regulation governing "failure to file a return". There is no computer code for "failure to file". The only thing we could find was a requirement stating "where to file" an income tax return. It can be found in 26 CFR, Sect. 1.6091-3, which states that, "Income tax returns required to be filed with the Director of International Operations". Who is the Director of International Operations?




Delegation Order Number 115 (Rev. 5) of May 12, 1986, is the only delegation of authority to conduct Audit. It states that the I.R.S. and B.A.T.F. can only audit themselves, and only for amount of $750.00 or less. Any amount above that amount, must be audited by the Controller General according to Title 31 USC. No other authority to audit exists. No I.R.S. or B.A.T.F. agent, or representative can furnish us with any law, rule, or regulation, which gives them the authority to audit anyone other than themselves. Order Number 191 states that they can levy on Property, but only if that Property is in the hands of third parties.

Authority to Investigate

The manual states on page 1100-40.2 of April 21, 1989, Criminal Investigation Division, that:- "the Criminal Investigation Division enforces the criminal statutes applicable to income, estate, gift, employment, and excise tax laws ... involving United States citizens, residing in foreign countries, and non resident aliens, subject to Federal income tax filing requirements, by developing information concerning alleged criminal violations thereof, evaluating allegations and indications of such violations, to determine investigations to be undertaken, investigating suspected criminal violations of such laws, recommending prosecution when warranted, and measuring effectiveness of the investigating process ... "


On page 1100 - 40.1 it states in 1132.7 of April 21, 1989, Director, Office of Taxpayer Service and Compliance, "Responsible for operation of a comprehensive enforcement and assistance program for all taxpayers under the immediate jurisdiction of the Assistant Commissioner (International) ... Directs the full range of collection activity on delinquent accounts and delinquent returns for taxpayers overseas, in Puerto Rico, and in United States possessions and territories.


1132.72 of April 21, 1989, Collection Division, says "Executes the full range of collection activities on delinquent accounts, which includes securing delinquent returns involving taxpayers outside the United States and those in United States territories, possessions and in Puerto Rico."


The United States Attorney's Manual, Title 6 Tax Division, Chapter 4, page 16, October 1, 1988, 6-4.270, Criminal Division Responsibility, states, "The Criminal Division has limited responsibility for the Prosecution of offenses investigated by the I.R.S. Those offenses are:- excise violations involving liquor tax, narcotics, stamp tax, firearms, wagering, and coin-operated gambling and amusement machines; MALFEASANCE OFFENSES COMMITTED BY I.R.S. PERSONNEL: forcible rescue of seized property; corrupt or forcible interference with an officer or employee, acting under INTERNAL REVENUE LAWS; and unauthorized mutilation, removal or misuse of stamps. See 28 CFR S 0.70.


We found this revelation in 28 USC Rule 54c, Application of Terms, "As used in these rules the following terms have the designated meanings. 'Act of Congress' includes any act of Congress locally applicable and in force in the District of Columbia, in Puerto Rico, in a territory or in an insular possession".


28 USC is the "Rules of the Courts" and was written and approved by the Justices of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court in writing 28 USC has already ruled upon this issue It is the Law.(l.o. How can the Supreme Court write law?)


Where does the MONEY go that is paid into the I.R.S.? It spends at least a year in what is called a "quad zero" account under and Individual Master File, after which time the Director of the I.R.S. Center can apparently do whatever he wants with the money. It is sometimes dispersed under Treasury Order 91 (Rev, 1 ), May 12, 1986 which is a service agreement between the I.R.S. and the Agency for International Development, A.I.D.


When William Casey, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency during the Iran-Contra, was the head of A.I.D. he funnelled hundreds of millions of dollars to the Soviet Union, which money was spent building the Kama River Truck Factory, the largest military production facility for tanks, trucks, armored personnel carriers, and other wheeled vehicles in he world. The Kama River factory has a production capability larger than all of the combined automobile and truck manufacturing plants in the United States. (l.o. New World order for the collapse and take over of the automotive industry).


The Agreement states "Authority is hereby delegated to the Assistant Commissioner International to develop and enter into the service agreement between the Treasury Department and the Agency for International Development. The Secretary of the Treasury is always appointed Governor of the International Monetary Fund (treason?) in accordance with the international agreement that CREATED the I.M.F. The Secretary of the Treasury is paid by the I.M.F. while acting as Governor (treason, emoluments?)

Agent Of Foreign Powers

Lloyd Bentsen held the following positions at the same time he was Secretary of the Treasury:


1. U.S. Governor of the International Monetary Fund,
2. U.S. Governor of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
3. U.S. Governor of the African Development Bank,
4. U.S. Governor of the Asian Development Bank,
5. U.S. Governor of the African Development Fund
6. U.S. Governor of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

Mr. Bentson received a salary from each of these organizations which literally made him an unregistered agent for several foreign powers (treason, emoluments?)

Citizen vs citizen

By birth we are each a Citizen of the State of New Jersey, or a Citizen of the State of California, or a Citizen of the State Florida, or a Citizen of the State of whatever State you wherein we were born, and at the same time, we are all Citizens of the united States of America, AND ARE NOT SUBJECT TO ACTS OF CONGRESS, OTHER THAN THE 18 GRANTS OF POWERS SPECIFICALLY CITED IN THE Constitution for the united States of America. People who are born or who reside within the federal District of Columbia, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, any territory, on any naval base or dockyard, within forts, or within insular possessions are called U.S. citizens AND are subject to Acts of Congress. Within the Law, words have meanings, that not the same meanings, that are accepted in common usage. our Constitution is the Constitution for the united States of America. The U.S. Constitution is the Constitution of Puerto Rico.


We are subject to the laws of the JURISDICTION which we volunteer to accept. In the Law governing Income tax, income is defined as foreign earned income, offshore oil well, or windfall profits, and war profits. A return is prepared by a TAXPAYER to submit to the federal government taxes that he or she has collected. A TAXPAYER IS ONE WHO COLLECTS TAXES AND SUBMITS THE TAXES AS A RETURN TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. AN EMPLOYEE IS ONE WHO IS EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. AN EMPLOYER IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. AN INDIVIDUAL IS A citizen OF GUAM OR THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. A BUSINESS IS DEFINED AS A GOVERNMENT, A BANK, OR AN INSURANCE COMPANY. A RESIDENT IS AN ALIEN CITIZEN OF GUAM, THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, OR PUERTO RICO, WHO RESIDES WITHIN ONE OF THE 50 STATES OF THE united STATES OF AMERICA or one of the other island possessions.

1040 for "ALIENS"

A form 1040 is the income tax return for a nonresident alien citizen of the U.S. Virgin Islands residing within one of the 50 States (geographically) of the several States of the united States of America. If you volunteer that you are a U.S. citizen, you have become a U.S. citizen. IF YOU WRITE OR PRINT YOUR NAME ON A LINE LABELED " taxpayer", you have become a taxpayer. Since these form are affidavits, which you submit under penalty of perjury, you commit a crime every time you fill one out and sign stating that you are that which you are not. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS DELIGHTED by your ignorance, AND WILL GLADLY ACCEPT YOUR RETURNS AND YOUR MONEY. As proof refer to The Virgin Islands Tax Guide which states, "All references to the District Director or to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should be interpreted to mean the Director of the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue. All references to the Internal Revenue Service, The Federal Depository and similar references should be interpreted as the B.I.R., and so forth. Any question interpreting Federal forms for use in the Virgin Islands should be referred to the B.I.R.."


In Internal Revenue Service publications 6209, Computer Codes for I.R.S. "TC 150" is listed as the Virgin Islands Returns" and the codes 300 through 398 are listed as "U.S. and UK Tax Treaty claims involving taxes on narcotics which were financed in the Cayman Islands and imported into the Virgin islands".


When Freedom of Information Act requests have been filed for Individual Master File (IMF) for people who are experiencing tax problems with the I.R.S., every return ha been found to contain the above codes except for some which are coded as "Guam" returns. Every return shows that the unsuspecting Citizen is being taxed on income derived from importing narcotics, alcohol, tobacco, or firearms into the United States or one of its territories or possessions, from a foreign country or from Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands or into the Virgin Islands form the Cayman Islands.


26 CFR, 601.103 (a) is the only place which tells us who is required to file a return, provided that person has been properly noticed by the District Director to KEEP RECORDS AND THEN NOTICED THAT HE/SHE IS REQUIRED TO FILE. It states, "In general, each taxpayer (or person required to collect and pay over the taxes) is required to file a prescribed form of return ..." Are you a Taxpayer? (l.o.- you must first be a tax collector)


The scam manifests itself in many different ways. In order to maintain the semblance of legality, hats are changed from moment to moment. When you are told to submit records for examination YOU ARE DEALING WITH CUSTOMS. When you submit an offer in compromise, YOU ARE DEALING WITH THE COAST GUARD. When you are confronted by a Special Agent of the I.R.S. you are really DEALING WITH A DEPUTIZED UNITED STATES MARSHALL. When you are being investigated by the alleged Internal Revenue Service, YOU ARE REALLY DEALING WITH AN AGENT, CONTRACTED BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, TO INVESTIGATE NARCOTICS VIOLATIONS. When the alleged Internal Revenue Service charges you with a crime, YOU ARE DEALING WITH THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS. Only a small part of 26 USC is administered by the Internal Revenue Service. Most of the Code is administered by THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL AND FIREARMS, including Chapter 61 through 80, which is ENFORCEMENT. ---- In addition, 27 CFR IS B.A.T.F. and states in Subpart B - DEFINITIONS, 250.11, MEANING OF TERMS, "United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms office - Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms office in Puerto Rico". Every Person we find, who is being prosecuted by the alleged Internal Revenue Service has a Code on their I.M.F. putting them in "tax class 6" which designates that they have violated a law relating to alcohol, tobacco, or firearms, Puerto Rico.


The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, has no venue or jurisdiction within the borders of any of the 50 States of the united States of America, except in pursuit of an importer of contraband alcohol, tobacco, or firearms, who failed to pay the TAX on those items. As proof, refer to the July 30, 1993 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 1 F.3d 1511; 1993 U.S. App. Lexis 19747, where the court ruled in United States v. D.J. Vollmer & Co. that "the B.A.T.F. has jurisdiction over the first sale of a firearm imported to the country, but they don't have jurisdiction over subsequent sales."


Attorneys, including your defense attorney, the U.S. Attorney, Federal Judges, and alleged Internal Revenue Service and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms personnel, routinely lie in depositions and on the witness stand to perpetuate the FRAUD. THIS THEY DO WILLINGLY AND WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY ARE COMMITTING PERJURY. EVERY JUDGE INTENTIONALLY LIES, EVERY TIME HE/SHE GIVES INSTRUCTIONS TO A JURY IN A CRIMINAL, OR TAX CASE, BROUGHT BY THE I.R.S. OR THE B.A.T.F. They all know it, and do it willingly, and with malice aforethought.


How does the government hire people, who will intentionally work to defraud their fellow Americans? Most of those who work on the lower levels for the I.R.S., B.A.T.F, and other Agencies simply do not know the truth. They do as they are told to earn a living until retirement. Executives, U.S. Attorneys, Federal Judges, and others, do KNOW, AND ARE, with full KNOWLEDGE and MALICE aforethought, participating in the crime of the century. MANY OF THESE PEOPLE ARE PAID LOTS OF MONEY. (l.o.-EVERY SOUL HAS ITS PRICE).


The Internal Revenue Manual; Handbook of Delegation Orders, January 17, 1983, PAGE 1229-91; outlines the alleged Internal Revenue Services's system of monetary awards, "of up to and including $5000.00, for any one individual employee or group of employees, in his/her immediate office, including field employees, engaged in National Office projects; and contributions of employees of other Government agencies and armed forces members"; WITH THE APPROVAL OF the Deputy Commissioner; " of $5,001.00 to $10,000.00, for any one individual or group", with the approval of the Deputy Commissioner; "of $10,001.00 to $25,000 for any one individual or group", with the Commissioner's concurrence, "an additional monetary reward of $10,000.00 (total $35,000.00) TO THE PRESIDENT THROUGH TREASURY AND OPM" with the Commissioner's concurrence. (IMPEACHABLE, TREASONABLE).


These awards include cash awards. They are not limited as to number, that may be awarded, to any one person or group. There is no limitation placed upon any award. Any person or group of persons can be awarded this money, including:- U.S. Attorneys, Federal Judges, your Certified Public Accountant, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, YOUR MOTHER, H&R BLOCK, etc. The awards may be given to the same person or group, each minute, each hour, every day, every week, every month, every year, or not at all. In other words, the U.S. Government and the alleged Internal Revenue Service, a.k.a, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms have a perfectly legal (l.o. not lawful) system of bribery. The bribery works against the Citizens of the several States of the united States of America.


Our investigation uncovered a lot. We have printed only a little. Successful use of this material requires a lot of study and an excellent understanding of the legal system. Please do not compound errors by attempting to extract some imaginary magic bullet against alleged Internal Revenue Service, or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO DISCOVER THIS INFORMATION. YOU MUST KNOW IT INSIDE OUT, BACKWARDS AND FORWARDS; LIKE A KNEEJERK RESPONSE.


We have been betrayed by those we trusted. We have been robbed of our money and property. It happened because we trusted imperfect men to rule imperfect men; and we failed in our duty as watchdog, and SOVEREIGNS OVER OUR SERVANTS. IT HAPPENED BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN IGNORANT, APATHETIC AND EVEN STUPID.


"A nation or world of people, who will not use their intelligence, are no better than animals that have no intelligence; such people are beasts of burden and steaks upon the table by choice and consent." "Behold a Pale Horse" by William Cooper, Light Technology Publishing, Sedona. A significant portion of the research, that led to the writing of this article was contributed by Mr. Wayne Bentson.

Following mirrored here in the interests of preserving this contents and expanding access to this content:

Document location ©2019 by Andrew K. Dart - Be sure to visit the Home page.     
Updated July 15, 2019.

Why Don't Liberals Just Say What They Mean?
A handy translation table from Liberal P.C. Doublespeak and code words to plain English

When they say... They really mean...
racial quotas,
discrimination against whites,
special rights and preferential treatment for protected minorities,
the exclusion of white males
the exclusion of heterosexual male caucasians.
diverse whites and Christians absent
get the word out sign up everyone in the lower class for lifetime dependence on the government
invest in the future redistribution of wealth,
spending borrowed money
community initiatives handouts and services for minorities only
community organizer agitator, troublemaker, radical, anarchist
"Prominent" Democrats
"Greedy" Republicans
unusually wealthy people
Justice-involved youth Juvenile delinquent
low-income citizens,
"victimized" minorities,
small parasitic organizations
federal family Big Brother
gun reform gun control
community education spreading propaganda
alliance liberal organization
affirmative action,
minority enterprise development,
minority business development,
disadvantaged business utilization,
equal opportunity,
diversity programs
racial quotas,
discrimination against whites,
minority hiring quotas,
lowered standards
rainforest jungle
kinetic operations war
human trafficking 21st-century slavery
carbon carbon dioxide
wetland swamp
the founders the Founding Fathers
ancestors forefathers
terrorists Islamist Muslim terrorists
revenue measure,
deficit reduction,
raising revenues,
balanced approach,
revenue enhancements,
progressive revenue,
Shared Responsibility Payment,
shared responsibility penalty
transfer station,
city dump
troubled inner-city youth
at-risk teen
gang leader, juvenile felon, thug, dope dealer, pimp, hoodlum, mugger
sex trade worker prostitute, whore, stripper, slut, tramp, hooker, hussy, harlot
sexual minorities sexual deviates, perverts
hard of seeing,
visually challenged,
people with blindness,
visually impaired,
visually limited,
the blind
(There is no shame in blindness, so why not just say "blind"?)
advocacy group
progressive liberal, radical, leftist
vegan vegetarian,
Earth worshipper
fiancee this month's roommate
graphic novel comic book
"It was an honest mistake." "We got caught."
urban black
"worked courageously" was arrested while picketing
Aleut, Inuit Eskimo
Native Americans Indians.  (Native Hawaiians are native Americans, but they're never called "Native Americans".)
undocumented workers,
foreign-born population,
Americans in waiting,
out of status,
migrant workers,
economic-driven immigrants,
DACA recipients,
asylum seekers
illegal immigrants,
illegal aliens
comprehensive immigration reform amnesty for illegal immigrants
reproductive rights,
reproductive choice,
reproductive freedom,
reproductive health care,
reproductive access,
fetal rights,
women's rights
health care decisions,
termination of pregnancy
fetal homicide,
pregnancy prevention childbirth prevention
sexually active promiscuous
pushing the envelope,
cutting edge,
compliments used to describe vulgar, offensive, profane, brazen, blasphemous or obscene entertainment venues, TV programs, movies or Hollywood personalities
residentially challenged,
street person,
bum, hobo, derelict, vagrant, drunkard, beggar,
drifter, tramp, vagabond, panhandler
food insecure households those who are too lazy to work
under-served communities those who are next in line for a handout
urban sprawl progress, growth, prosperity, suburbs, commuters
targeted spending buying votes
left behind anything that escapes the scrutiny, control, and taxation of the federal government
light pollution Such an abundance of affordable electric energy that many homes, highways and places of business are brightly illuminated at night.  Seemingly impossible in Communist countries.
resource extraction Drilling for oil
Cutting down trees
Mining, especially for coal
raping the earth Drilling for oil,
Cutting down a tree,
Burning wood,
Eating a steak,
Buying a large automobile or minivan,
Wearing anything made of fur or leather
suboptimal outcome
negative gain
deferred success
academic failure
you flunked
This is a time to put politics aside YOU put YOUR politics aside, and we will politicize the crisis du jour
When they mention... They're talking about...
sustainable economy
the greater good
part of something larger
shared responsibility
living wage laws
economic justice
affordable housing
giving back to the community
everyone shared in that success
this will require common effort
earnings inequality
power to the people
the struggle
wealth concentration
redistribution of wealth
sustainable development,
environmental rights,
corporate pressure tactics,
corporate social responsibility
anti-development, anti-industry, anti-property, anti-technology environmentalism
private economic success
income inequality,
speaking truth to power,
The Democrat platform:
expanding the government
balanced solution increased government power
dark money contributions to conservative causes
extended family dynamics fatherlessness
raising awareness,
make a difference
raising money
glaucoma legalizing marijuana
fairness higher taxes for the middle class,
redistribution of wealth
separation of church and state the prohibition of Christianity
unlawful migration,
gray employment,
informal workers
illegal aliens
join the struggle
hate speech,
the religious right,
religious extremists
religious objections to homosexuality,
religious objections to abortion,
any favorable discussion of conservatism
for the children,
it takes a village,
for our future,
Goals 2000,
Agenda 21,
School to Work,
Life-Long Learning,
outcome-based education,
behavior modification,
leave no child behind,
children at risk
cradle-to-grave socialism,
indoctrination disguised as education,
collectivist group-think instead of individual achievement,
conformity instead of individualism
social responsibility high taxes
cultural proficiency amnesty for illegal aliens
affirmative action
special rights for selected minorities
giving back to the community taxing the rich
guilt-tripping a lottery winner, corporate executive, or overpaid athlete
human rights Marxism, socialism
special rights and privileges for minorities and homosexuals
community medical services condoms,
needle exchanges,
abortion on demand
gender reassignment sex change operations
meaningful coverage
universal health care
socialized medicine
creative confrontation
direct action violent eco-terrorism
equal rights
better-than-equal rights
preferential treatment
watchdog lobbyist
assault weapons,
gun reform,
gun violence solutions,
gun shows,
violence prevention,
cop-killer bullets,
senseless gun violence,
saner gun policies
gun control,
banning all gun ownership
disarming the law-abiding populace
infrastructure, community development increased spending,
dependence on big government
Women's health choices killing an inconvenient baby
world class,
global citizenship,
global village,
United Nations,
World Bank,
International Monetary Fund,
Charter for Global Democracy,
International Court of Justice
world-wide standards,
world government,
world-wide socialism
approval and endorsement of perverse, deviant lifestyles

Liberals speak in politically correct code so people won't realize that they are promoting socialism, marxism, abortion, dumbed-down schools, and every imaginable form of deviant behavior and sexual perversion. Bible-based traditional values are what created and what have preserved our nation. Leftists cannot afford to say what they mean without obfuscation.